Identifying Market Opportunities for Rural Smallholder Producers to support agencies implementing a participatory approach to rural agroenterprise development
This guide is the third in a series from CIAT designed to support agencies implementing a participatory approach to rural agroenterprise development.
Transforming Gender Relations Through the Market: Smallholder Milk Market Participation and Women's Intra-household Bargaining Power in Ethiopia
Dairy in Ethiopia was traditionally a woman's industry and male involvement was considered taboo. Increases in the use of contracting to enter formal markets required the participation of the usually male head of household. Using a quasi-expiriment and propensity-score matching, the authors find that income is higher for smallholder milk market participants and men control more of the income compared with non-market participants
COMMODITY SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
This manual provides a methodology for identifying problems and causes leading to postharvest food losses along an agricultural value chain. It describes the process of finding solutions that reduce food losses. The manual is organized as follows. The first three chapters highlight the importance of reducing food losses and describe the agricultural value chain. Chapter 4 identifies 26 priority components where food losses can occur along agricultural value chains. Chapter 5 shows how information on specific agricultural value chains can be collected and organized to identify these components and identifies which stakeholders are likely to be involved in each stage of the value chain. Chapter 6 covers the processes used to find solutions to minimize food losses.
The manual also contains a set of annexes that provide tools for identifying and preventing losses along agricultural food chains. The annexes include: a checklist of potential problems in an agricultural value chain; example questionnaires for agricultural value chain components; example questionnaires for collecting information on public sector institutions, farmers’ organizations, and development projects; a list of simplified questions for each component of the agricultural value chain; a summary of the postharvest system of mango in Uttar Pradesh, India; worksheets for quantifying postharvest losses of leafy vegetables, fruits, roots, tubers and bulbs in agricultural value chains; and a postharvest cost-benefit worksheet.
Featured best practice
Index Insurance Applied to Agriculture: The Mexican Case
Uncertainty and risk are characteristics inherent in agricultural activities, and one of the main sources of risk is weather. Because agriculture depends heavily on rainfall, it is sensitive to weather changes. Agriculture is also vulnerable to extreme weather events; floods, droughts, and frosts cause both production and capital losses. Approximately 98 percent of the catastrophic risk to agriculture in Mexico stems from two types of weather events: droughts (accounting for 80 percent) and cyclones (accounting for 18 percent). Low-income rural populations are highly vulnerable to the harmful effects of weather, yet their access to insurance programs is almost nonexistent.
The private and public insurance sectors
The private sector’s limited participation in agricultural insurance in Mexico has been oriented toward large or very well organized producers. Low-income agricultural producers do not have access to insurance, but rather rely on monetary transfers from the government in the wake of extreme weather events. The systemic risk present in agriculture discourages private sector insurers from entering this market. The risk is catastrophic in nature, and insurers face high financial costs in building up sufficient reserves to cover sustained losses. In addition, much of the rural agricultural sector is characterized by low profitability and highly fragmented possession of land that is subject to extreme weather risks. Operating costs for insurers are also high because of the sociodemographic and geographic characteristics of Mexican agriculture. Given this environment, the Mexican government has generated mechanisms to help low-income producers who have no public or private insurance reduce the risk of catastrophic losses from weather. In 1995, it established the National Fund for Natural Disasters (FONDEN), a federal program that provides ad hoc funds following natural disasters to local governments and public dependencies for infrastructure rebuilding and for restoration of natural resources, natural protected areas, coastal areas, and riverbeds. In 2003 the Fund to Assist Rural Populations Affected by Weather Contingencies (PACC) was created to target assistance to small farmers in the event of weather-related shocks, including frost and wind damage. Costs are shared between the federal government (70 percent) and state governments (30 percent). These fiscal resources have covered the rural population’s urgent needs related to catastrophic weather events, but uncertainty about the occurrence of such events has meant that in some years these resources have been assigned to other programs.
Some agricultural risks may not be commercially insurable because of these specific industry characteristics:
1. the presence of correlated or systemic risks, particularly those related to extreme weather phenomena;
2. the probability of extreme events with large expected losses that are difficult to quantify; and
3. agriculture’s high costs of operation.
One viable solution to these problems is index insurance. Index insurance offers operating and technical elements that permit it to handle adverse weather phenomena more efficiently by correlating crop types to risks. It can also reduce the cost of offering insurance by analyzing regional, not individual, risk and vulnerability; establishing thresholds or critical levels for weather variables that serve as indicators of impact; reducing the need for individual contracts, field inspections, or adjustments of individual losses; and reducing insurance market problems such as adverse selection and moral hazard.
To effectively operate CAI, AGROASEMEX implemented the following key actions:
1. Isolate the effect of climatic events from the other factors of production. AGROASEMEX developed a specific model (Simulation Model for Agricultural Insurance) in which it is possible to represent the effect of a weather variable on production levels and therefore to calculate the threshold values of this variable.
2. Determine the periods of protection. AGROASEMEX decided on the term of the insurance in light of the timing of water requirements for sowing and crop growth.
3. Create agroclimatic zones of homogeneous response. AGROASEMEX identified groups of weather stations with similar characteristics to determine climatologically homogeneous regions. The existence of microclimates in the zones where AGROASEMEX intends to operate, however, does reduce the efficiency of the weather indexes.
4. Determine the threshold values of the weather variable. AGROASEMEX determined threshold values for rainfall during each cropping phase; when actual rainfall is lower than the threshold value during any phase, it is considered an insurable adverse event.
5. Establish weather stations and weather databases. To make index insurance viable, a long-term, reliable, and homogeneous database of weather information is needed, as are weather stations that report weather data quickly.
6. Derive an actuarial valuation of risk. AGROASEMEX used a method of actuarial valuation of risk that must be adjusted to the volatility that is inherent in rainfall patterns.
In 2002, after addressing the methodological and conceptual issues related to CAI, AGROASEMEX carried out an experimental test of the insurance scheme to identify strengths and weaknesses as well as to identify areas for technical and operating improvement. The test carried out field trials to evaluate the strength of the threshold values for rainfall by assessing the correlation of the threshold values, crop growth, and production levels. During the sowing phase, observed rainfall levels in all cases exceeded the threshold values and thus no adverse events were registered. To evaluate the strength of the threshold values established for this phase, a level of soil moisture was identified to determine the date when the soil reached its maximum moisture capacity at each of the climate stations considered in the test. The results showed that for all stations, the maximum moisture capacity was reached in the dates pre-established in the insurance contract for both sorghum and corn. During the flowering and crop growth phases, AGROASEMEX found that the linear models used, and consequently the threshold rainfall values, were well correlated with field conditions for crops. The results of this test of CAI support the feasibility of the methodology and concepts developed by AGROASEMEX. This form of insurance was well suited for commercialization under the assumptions and conditions established in the test and in the regions tested. One additional task was to establish an efficient procedure for choosing the weather stations to be used in the insurance scheme, through coordination between CONAGUA (National Water Commission) and AGROASEMEX, to guarantee a rapid flow of rainfall data. Between 2003 and 2005, AGROASEMEX insured an area of 1.5 million hectares containing 186 weather stations. The total sum insured was US$88.1 million, premiums were US$13.3 million, and indemnities totaled US$10.5 million. A transfer of risk to the international market starting in 2004, through Partner Re, helps AGROASEMEX to insure the most vulnerable sectors of the rural population. In 2006 CAI was estimated to cover 2.3 million hectares containing 297 weather stations, with a total insured sum of US$131.9 million and premiums of US$17.3 million. According to AGROASEMEX estimates, CAI covered 3 million hectares in 18 states in 2009. The growth of this form of insurance is limited by the availability of weather databases that comply with quality standards. Alternatives for improving analysis and data collection are being explored.
Dr. Iddo Dror joined ILRI as Head of Capacity Development (CapDev) in Oct 2012, and in line with the new ILRI strategy 2013-2022, leads the development of knowledge, attitudes, skills and institutional arrangements that are necessary to replicate, expand, adapt, use, support and sustain livestock research and its application for development in a variety of contexts across ILRI and its projects/CRPs.